Showing posts with label reporters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reporters. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 15, 2014
Sir Arthur At The Kennedy Space Center
Arthur C. Clarke (who died Sir Arthur, after receiving a well-deserved knighthood) was a casual but long-term friend. He often had dinner at the Greenhouse when visiting the Kennedy Space Center. (He also attended the Apollo 11 prelaunch party at the Greenhouse, a tale told elsewhere.) A large briefing room at the KSC Visitors Center had been named "Room 2001" in his honor, and the NASA branch stationed there dubbed their conference room "2010". Just before I retired I persuaded the manager of the Astronauts Memorial Foundation, also at the Visitors Center, to name their major presentation area "Room 2061", to complete the trilogy. (I don't know if he followed through.)
Working behind the scenes, I usually managed to get myself assigned as Clarke's official escort. The last time he came (August 1994) before I retired in 1996, he had some difficulty walking, and needed a wheelchair for long distances. He managed the short walks in and out of buildings by holding on to my shoulder.
Clarke was at KSC this time primarily to attend a press conference, in his capacity as a member of the Diane Fossey Gorilla Fund Board of Trustees. The NASA connection with Fossey was the Space Radar Laboratory-1, which had flown in the cargo bay of a Shuttle Orbiter the previous April, obtainiing some excellent multi-use data on gorilla habitats. But as with most distinguished guests, his itinerary included visits to several sites of major interest.
Over the course of most of a day, while being driven from site to site (KSC is very big, and spread out), we had several chances to chat. The subject of the then-extant SF mags came up. Clarke told me he faithfully subscribed to ALL of them -- but they just went directly on to his library shelves. He didn't actually read them; couldn't find the time.
The press conference came at the end of the day, when Clarke was visibly tiring. The local press turned out in force, probably 30 or more; an unusually high number for anything less than a launch. I escorted Clarke to the table on the dais, which he shared with some other people associated with the Gorilla Fund, and took a seat in front.
The press conference itself was fairly routine, except that the press concentrated their attention on Clarke and almost ignored the others. He perked up a little while sitting and answering questions. At the end of the standard 30-minute conference I stood up and announced that we would take two more questions, and then had to go.
The two questions came, the conference officially ended -- and then half or more of the reporters present hurriedly dug into their rucksacks or tote bags, pulled out copies of Arthur C. Clarke books, and rushed the table for autographs!
Press people, by and large, are a skeptical lot. This uncoordinated, spontaneous rush to get their books autographed while they had the chance warmed the intake valves of this cynical old heart. Clarke, although a little startled, seemed happy to comply. So I sat back down, and for another ten or twelve minutes, Clarke autographed books. Then, finally, I could get him out of the building and into our waiting limousine.
I had already escorted Arthur to see several people and places, including a meeting with the highest local dignitaries in the KSC Center Director's office. But it was that demonstration of genuine, unforced admiration on the part of the press corps that I most like to remember.
Labels:
Arthur C. Clarke,
Kennedy Space Center,
reporters
Tuesday, June 24, 2014
Extra! Extra! Keep Readin' All About It?
On October 1, 2012, four newspapers owned by Advance Publications, “The Birmingham News”, the Mobile “Press-Register”, “The Huntsville Times” and the New Orleans major newspaper, “The Times-Picayune”, all moved to a three-day publication schedule. This move, along with similar cutbacks and reductions in other newspapers nationwide (usually caused by a serious drop in advertising revenue) led many to predict the imminent demise of the daily newspaper.
That prediction seems to have been somewhat premature, though it’s true many are still struggling. The respected “Washington Post” was recently sold, and the venerable “Boston Globe” has encountered problems. So have many more of the larger newspapers. But some have successfully adjusted to decreased revenue by cutting staff, reducing other expenses, and upping subscription prices. And many smaller papers have hung in there, and survived.
Our local newspaper, “Florida TODAY”, recently did a thorough revamp, including changing the B section to a reduced version, usually six or eight pages, of “USA TODAY”. Parent company Gannett did the same with 34 more local papers they own. Counting the mini-versions along with the much larger stand-alone, “USA TODAY” now claims a daily circulation of nearly 3.3 million, the largest of any US newspaper. And hopefully, adding the “USA TODAY” segment at no extra charge will help these smaller papers “live long and prosper”.
The A section of “Florida TODAY” changed to emphasize local news, including business activities, social affairs, and the comics. Sports still has its own section, and includes national and international coverage along with local news. The “USA TODAY” section provides national and world news, including financial and entertainment segments.
“Florida TODAY” began life as just “TODAY”, before Gannett President Allan Neuharth , who started this new paper as the local publisher and rode its success to the top spot in Gannett, decided to also create the first general interest national newspaper. He and his team modeled “USA TODAY” on “TODAY”, and then added “Florida” to the local title for greater differentiation.
The fact that my local paper seems back on equilibrium is encouraging. “Florida TODAY” isn't a large paper, serving primarily our county of over half a million, with substantial sales in the smaller county south of us. It now costs close to a dollar a day for the print version, home delivered. A digital version, read on your Kindle, other tablet or smart phone, costs much less.
In an era in which anyone can go on-line and claim to be dispensing 'news', I think the old standards of verification from several sources, and/or confirmation by direct contact, have taken a severe hit. We need the discipline and rigor of professional reporters if the ‘news’ is to have any real value. We can get personal opinion (as opposed to a reporting of reasonably well established facts) from the innumerable commentators on television.
Otherwise we're riding the Shockwave, while Standing On Zanzibar. And the Winter Of Our Discontent grows colder.
Photo credit: Patrice Green
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)